8.2. Equipment Replacement Analysis Assignment
Equipment Replacement Assignment
(Defender Vs. Challenger Method)
(Free to share with attribution)
By Ted Robak
The following is information gathered and estimated by a contractor who is considering whether and when to replace the current harvester he owns with another similar one or one that uses new (improved) technology, but which costs significantly more. Please undertake the analysis and determine what he should do.
|
Defender |
O-Harvester |
Current technology (can still be purchased today) |
||||||
|
(Now 2 Yrs Old) |
|
@ New Cost of |
710,000 |
|
|
|
||
|
|
Market Value |
UCC |
CuM/PMH |
O&M/PMH |
Utilization |
|
||
|
Yr 0 (NOW) |
454,400 |
422,450 |
|
|
|
|
||
|
Yr 1 (3rd Yr) |
363,520 |
295,715 |
12.00 |
76.00 |
79.00 |
|
||
|
Yr 2 (4th Yr) |
290,816 |
207,001 |
12.00 |
77.00 |
77.00 |
|
||
|
Yr 3 (5th Yr) |
232,653 |
144,900 |
11.50 |
80.00 |
75.00 |
|
||
|
Yr 4 (6th Yr) |
186,122 |
101,430 |
11.00 |
81.00 |
73.00 |
|
||
|
Yr 5 (7th Yr) |
148,898 |
71,001 |
11.00 |
84.00 |
71.00 |
|
||
|
Yr 6 (8th Yr) |
119,118 |
49,701 |
11.00 |
85.00 |
69.00 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Challenger |
N-Harvester |
(New technology) |
|
|||||
|
|
|
@ Cost of |
920,000 |
|
|
|
||
|
|
Market Value |
UCC |
CuM/PMH |
O&M/PMH |
Utilization |
|
||
|
NOW (Yr 0) |
920,000 |
920,000 |
|
|
|
|
||
|
Yr 1 |
736,000 |
782,000 |
12.50 |
86.50 |
80.00 |
|
||
|
Yr 2 |
588,800 |
547,400 |
13.50 |
87.62 |
82.00 |
|
||
|
Yr 3 |
471,040 |
383,180 |
14.00 |
88.74 |
82.00 |
|
||
|
Yr 4 |
376,832 |
268,226 |
14.00 |
89.86 |
80.00 |
|
||
|
Yr 5 |
301,466 |
187,758 |
14.00 |
90.98 |
80.00 |
|
||
|
Yr 6 |
241,172 |
131,431 |
14.00 |
92.10 |
76.00 |
|
||
|
Yr 7 |
192,938 |
92,002 |
13.00 |
93.22 |
74.00 |
|
||
|
Yr 8 |
154,350 |
64,401 |
12.50 |
94.34 |
72.00 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Notes:(Must extrapolate market value for new old tech machine at end of years 1 and 2) |
|
|||||||
|
Tax Rate = |
25 |
|
Days/Yr |
210 |
|
|
||
|
Wood Price |
$17.00 |
|
Wages/SMH |
$18.00 |
|
|
||
|
SMH/Day |
16 |
|
MARR (%) |
9 |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Old Tech: |
Utilization |
Productivity |
O&M/PMH |
|
||||
|
Year 1 = |
78 |
12 |
74 |
|
||||
|
Year 2 = |
81 |
12 |
75 |
|
||||
- Login to post comments
